Published:


Corporate profiteering, the relentless pursuit of excessive profits without ethical considerations, has become a significant factor in the realm of international business. In the interconnected global economy, the actions of companies in one country can have far-reaching consequences, particularly in terms of inflation. Corporate profiteering affects inflation and has created a global ripple effect.

At its core, inflation is the sustained increase in the general price of goods and services in an economy. While various factors contribute to inflation, corporate profiteering can exacerbate the problem by distorting market dynamics and influencing pricing mechanisms. 

A report compiled by Groundwork Collaborative thinktank found that corporate profits accounted for about 53% of inflation during last year’s second and third quarters. In the past 40 years before the pandemic, profits drove about 11% of price growth. There has been a 3.4% increase in consumer prices over the last year, however, the input costs for producers increased only by 1%. 

For firms listed in the United Kingdom, there has been a 30% increase in business profits. This was driven by 11% of firms that made major profits due to their ability to work through significant price increases. As wage increases failed to move at the same pace as inflation, these profit surges were seen. Workers suffered the largest decrease in disposable incomes since the Second World War. 

In the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, energy companies such as ExxonMobil and Shell, mining firms Glencore and Rio Tinto, and even other businesses such as Kraft Heinz and Bunge all saw their profits outpace inflation. These corporation’s high prices are maintained by exploiting cost shocks with coordinating price hikes. Due to the shocks, an environment is created in which firms are safe to increase prices as their competitors are expected to do the same.  

Energy and food prices significantly feed into costs in all sectors of the economy. This exacerbated the initial price shock and contributed to a longer-lasting, higher peaking inflation than if there had been less market power

In an analysis of 1,350 companies listed on the stock markets in the United Kingdom, Germany, South Africa, Brazil, and the United States, firms in the technology sector, banking industry, and telecommunications all pushed through significant price increases that raised their profit margins. These companies can protect and even increase their profit margins, which creates excess profits through global market dynamics and high market power.

Significant harm to the economy has been caused by this. It is predicted that global GDP would be around 8% higher if market power had not risen. Economic dynamism is weaker, and labor income is significantly lower. There are fewer economic opportunities and worse product qualities due to this. 

Some have acknowledged that prices have risen to boost profits; however, during a time of cost shock, companies will naturally increase their prices. When costs fall, price-setting firms have no incentive to decrease prices. Due to declining input costs in the summer months, executives at Procter and Gamble said they expect $800m in windfall profits, pointing towards the idea that they will not bring down prices. 

Workers’ share of corporate earnings is still down from pre-pandemic times, which has caused steps to be taken to strengthen supply chains in the United States. In France, the government is intervening in price negotiations between retailers and producers. Some products were banned from shelves because of  “unacceptable price increases.”

The pervasive impacts of corporate profiteering on inflation and global economics are unmistakable. As businesses prioritize excessive profits over ethical considerations, the consequences reverberate across borders, affecting consumers, workers, and entire economies. Businesses are forced to address the negative impact of it to promote ethical business practices and transparency, promoting a more equitable economy.

Share this article